Talk:Qusp/@comment-173.206.248.47-20150415195354

Never made any sense to me.

How not splitting morally different than splitting into macroscopically identical copies that all proceed to make the same choice, like an ordinary computer would? If the splitting itself is immoral even without classical indeterminacy, then what about florescent lights, imperfectly reflective surfaces, and a zillion other things that are quantum-indeterministic?

Hell, complementarity basically makes it impossible in practice for anything not to have some quantum indeterminacy. So why pick on computation?

"Oracle" makes it even more confusing, since the end implies some sort of multiverse-supression field has been developed. Why not just use that then?